Story James Watson
Ich habe bewiesen, dass der Dynamitpreis der blödeste Preis aller Preise der Welt ist - sogar noch vor dem Buchpreis des SS Deitschen Juden-Friedenshandels.
Meine Satire auf James Watson in Ehren (siehe unten), aber es sei eigentlich der Kerl etwas entschuldigt....
Hier meine Fakten:
Die Weiber und Huren
Weiber sind intellektuell wertlos. Je höher sie steigen, umso wertloser werden sie. Etwa der Unterschied von der Masse zum Hund ist jener vom Mann zur Frau. Klar doch sind die Männer saudumm, beinahe alle, aber die Weiber können überhaupt nicht denken. Sie sind einzig klar in ihrer Eloquenz - von Umwelt und Zukunft und dem Verrecken der Menschheit kapieren sie nichts. So verwechseln die MeToo Huren das Vögeln mit Vergewaltigung, einfach weil sie die Zusammenhänge verpassen. Weiber nett zu finden, muss ein Irrtum sein.
Die Männer
Diese Arschlöcher zu 99 Prozent bauen einfach mit Einstein die Atombombe, mit Milton Friedman den Liberalismus und mit den Weibern die GRETA Ökologie und dann verrecken die Massen in 50 Jahren. Man sollte eben auf Delavy hören statt auf Männer mit Scheisse im Gehirn, die immerhin noch gescheiter sind wie die Thatcher-Weiber.
Die Jugendlichen
Die Jugendlichen haben nur EINES im Gehirn: Sie wollen reich werden, sie wollen reisen, sie wollen demonstrieren und sie wollen vögeln und sonst gar nichts. Die Welt wurde zu 75 Prozent kaputt gemacht von 1990 bis heute, also von den Jugendlichen, weil diese neuerdings nur noch Smartphones haben und Bullshit im Gehirn.
Die Eliten
Die Eliten sehen nie einen Richter für ihre Verbrechen und sie sorgen dafür, dass sie keine Steuern leisten müssen und sie sind der «Deep State» der Juden und sie werden verrecken am Massaker der 99 Prozente.
Die Masse
Die Masse ist denkunfähig, sonst hätten wir weder eine Bevölkerungsexplosion noch den tödlichen Klimakollaps noch Geld ohne jeden Wert. Die Masse verreckt an sich selbst und den Verbrechen ihrer Eliten und merken dies nicht einmal. Man soll nicht weinen, dass jetzt diese Masse vertrottelt und verreckt – wurde nämlich etwa Zeit hiefür!
Die Genies
Es gibt nur ein Genie, weder Shakespeare, noch Descartes oder Plato und auch nicht Adam Smith oder Einstein – sondern nur Delavy. Aber genau dies NICHT zu kapieren, macht den wahren Wert des Genies aus.
Die Dynamitpreis-Idioten
Ich habe nachgewiesen in einem Text (siehe unten), dass alle Dynamitpreisidioten nur Scheisse im Gehirn vorfinden, nicht nur Watson. Aber die 99,999 Prozente der Tiere (höchste Affen) kapieren dies niemals vor ihrem TOD.
Noch Fragen – Idioten?
Renée Delavy – Côte d’Azur
written on June 7, 2021
White have less IQ than Black -
Nobel Prize James Watson said
The writer of
this Letter is white. According to Nobel Prize Holder James Watson of "Cold
Spring Harbour Laboratoriums" in
This 79-years
old man was excused from having some speeches in Science Museums in
Look at these examples:
- Who was the
greatest sucker in
- Who is the
greater idiot in our world: GW Bush or Kofi Annan? What a stupid question. The
one is white, prepares WW III pretending to avoid it - and governs the most admired
hegemoniac
- Who has more
fame and IQ, Mandela or Blair? No doubt. Blair was at the head of Apartheid in
- Who had more
effective CIA: Kennedy or Mao? What Mao is not black? Jesus, James Watson left
out the Yellows. - But still: Kennedy built up wars against socialism with CIA
killers, 3 Mio. victims in
Worried about so
many proofs for superiority of white people over the black and yellow, I
decided to change my overall philosophies and try to meet Watson in
My ethical philosophy before was: There are not just very stupid or wise people in white species - and in black, in yellow, in brown and beige, with "8 steps of intellectual power" (see former Letter). No, "the species as such" are more or less average IQ of 100, with very high and low spirits to be noticed.
However, I must have missed some lessons at school: IQ is dependent on skin-colour, Dynamite Prize Watson told us. And what have we to keep in mind for all times? We have to remember: When a stupid from Oslo or Stockholm, like Al Bore or Allah Spam de Greenhorn, speaks up, the low rest has to keep quiet and get on knees, not only at Rome's Peters Square.
After some
efforts I got Watson on the phone in
When hanging up
the phone, I did no longer remember the meeting point: Was it New York Times,
Washington Post, USA Today or
Standing at that corner, I was looking out for some white guy with Nobel gold medal around his neck. But only some Bobbies were standing around, protecting an odd house with Number 10. But what could my eyes see over the street? --- That black, black Negro with a gold medal….? - Jesus, can't be. I hurried to the chap and heard him whisper: "It's me, Watson. Was forced to blacken my face. English white intellectuals hate me now. Let's go to that Chinese restaurant over there, since I like to be surrounded by lower IQ…."
When we sat at a table in Chinese restaurant, some waiter presented in all friendliness his card. "You see", said Watson after a while. "This guy is owner of this restaurant and some hundred others too, but he likes to play the waiter. He is yellow, he is lower... - just call me James!"
"Dear James. I don't understand: Lower than what? Lower in IQ than white, lower than black, lower than Watson? Is this possible?"
James grinned
over both ears: "Lower than Russians and Japanese. Look at Putin, he is
not white, he is not yellow, he is lower, he is Russian. Or take the car
producers of
"Yes",
I confirmed, "they are in general small people. Oh, you meant intellect?
You are saying that there is a "Line of IQ", just as Hitler had for
races, or I have published recently as "Steps of Thoughts" in view of
intellect? You want pretend that first come in brainy matters the white
Californians, than the Popes, then the US presidents, than Allah Spam de Greenhorn,
then some Black or Brown chaps like Colin Powell, Condy Rice or whitened Henry
Kissinger, than the Hu and Wen false socialists from Yellow-County? Further
down the Russians, around
"Dear Delavy: The studies of Gene-specialists of "Cold Spring Harbour" south of Canada have brought it to light, beyond any doubt: Whites with Catholic-orthodox faith, living in Italy, are absolute top in IQ, after having stolen some land, comparable to Palestine, a county today better known as Vatican-City. Just behind rank the new-born Anti-Darwinists of Texas, followed by NY Jews of higher grade gone with their beards into the Middle East, then come the Scandinavian Nobel Prize Holders of any colour and finally the pseudo-liberal Blair-Blacks, but still ranking upper to Yellow-Congress of the 3000 new-rich Chinese going down the drain soon, living down very Far-East, followed by South America's Pinochet-Videlist's Nazis, only surpassed by the Russian new-hegemonic communists and finally the soon tumbling new-liberalistic Japanese, having taken in their portfolios, together with Koreans, Chinese and other lower races, all the worthless US treasury, for financing the insane life-style of the most clever of them all, the US bankrupt Whites. And this closes the circle of IQ-testing on this globe."
"I'm
impressed to the point of believing in your theory, dear James. According to
your logics, lower would be the normal Indians, the "Untouchables",
followed by the not so normal Indians, the "Touchables", even lower
then the aristocratic Indians, the Singh-government. Not to forget further down
the Polish Twins and Popes, the Shrine-Koizumists, the al-Qaeda-Sharonists, the
nature-killing Greengrassians, finally the reality-analysing Indigenous, called
by WEF and US White the "IMF-Dwarfs" of
James was very
annoyed: "Listen Rene: Our studies ended with the conclusion, that growth
of IQ is the privilege of the white "Crusade" species, who invented
fast destruction and ending of all resources and energy stuffs, plus shattering
down US and Swiss banks, liquidating Arab oil sources, as well as Africa's
infrastructure and agriculture, torturing to death some IQ-youth of higher
intelligentsia in Chile and Argentina with help all the President's men, the
extremely white CIA-FBI intelligence. Here you have the final proofs. - Well, according
to our
"My almighty God!", I shouted and asked for the waiter's respective owners bill, paid the two meals inclusive Coffee and Saki, kissed James Watson on his blacked cheeks and left London with highest possible speed, leaving behind this white-washed bunch on a black-yellow-rainbow coloured island, having its existence in midst of an intellectual desert of fast declining wisdom on Earth, emptied from any serious matters. Well, I guess the English very heavily need a new Bertrand Russell.
So, we shall never know if GW Bush or Watson or Delavy will have been the most intelligent White on Earth, belonging to a special high-breed of under-ground Christianity, the so-called New-born Bible-belt Jesuses, believing in governing and having rights over all other Islamists, Maoists, Stalinists, Mandelians, Buddhists, Confucians, Hindis, Scientologists and so on.
World's males
and females should learn that the difference in IQ is solely basing on skin
colours - and not a question of education or sex, where anyway the stupid males
have taken over the command, at least beyond Western-style World. Now we know
that the black, red, brown or yellow race may, under some curious
circumstances, possess less IQ than the brightest stars of white
"Nobel
Prize" - Synonym for a chaotic and insane World?
(All illusions about measuring reality)
We should start to think about the real value of the Nobel Prize. Is it as important and heroic as everyone guesses? Let's start an overall view on the history of the Nobel Prize:
The founder of this prize, as everyone knows, heard on the name of "Nobel". This word as used in German language means something like "high-born, stylish, extravagant or expensive". This suits perfectly! And what did Nobel, this "High-born"? He gave the world the first mass destruction in form of Dynamite. This stuff was used and still is used, not only to dig tunnels in beautiful mountains, but also to blow up human bodies in the air. It was done so in two World Wars and still is done by state wars and its reaction, the individual counter-terrorism against these wars.
What a nice start of "une belle histoire"! N'est-ce pas? Unfortunately, this story does not improve with times. Cheap ideologies, together with poor Nobel-prized intellectual performances, created a cheap sense for reality in a Huxley-World. Based on this maxim, have a close look of who got this Prize in the last 60 years:
Yes, some nice persons with integrity got it. However, most of the winners got the Nobel Prize for utterly wrong reasons. Look at these arguments:
- Many men and women got it that might have done more for the technological destruction of our platform of living than any other "average"-people - in view of helplessness for future generations in an out-powered world. They have apparently studied how to better the world, but the achievements of their minds were more of an explosive stuff than dynamite. What do planes or cars else but transform billions of tons of energy stuff into deadly gas and destroying therewith the climate of the planet, thus poisoning air and spoiling water and grounds? And this goes for most of the technological matters ever invented.
- Take the mathematical "geniuses". They have found theories for economics of growth that do nothing else but accelerate the destruction of future life on this planet. The higher the profits, the faster the production, the quicker the services, the greater the number of cars and planes, the higher the laws of feasibility… and we can watch a world were all mechanics of self destruction grow faster and faster. The point of no return has long time before passed by; so about the year 1975. Since those days, nothing can ever correct the terrifying mistakes made in development, these crazy brains of Nobel have helped to develop.
- What about Economics? Let's face it.
Most of these Prizes went to US-Americans. Why? Face the results: Based on neo-liberal
ideas we noticed how huge US-firms became more and more powerful, whereas the
poorest nations lost all their chances because these models of "increase
in profit and shareholder value" were modelled to let flow money to those
"who have" and make starve those "who have not". It's so easy.
Such a theory cannot work, not in the
- And the Nobel Prize for Medicine? Sure, when I get in a hospital I hope to be cured by the medicaments created by some bright brains. But look at the other side: This help to human mankind made explode just one and only species, the Homo sapiens. We will be seven and may reach ten billion soon. At what price? Remember above points and look at another truth: A mass humanity, living with mass animals, produced Birds flue, AIDS and some other pandemics still to come. And the curse of other sicknesses like tuberculosis, malaria and many other were believed eclipsed forever. And now they are increasing fast again, because poverty, produced out of neo-liberalism and the craziness of models of feasibility, have more effects than often harmful or deadly achievements of many Nobel Prize-winners.
- And the Nobel Prize for achievements in Literature? Look at this literature without prejudice. Isn't it recycling for the ten thousandth time the ever same feelings of humans? Love, hatred, murder, killing, fun and action and heaps of superficial scrap, considered to be the most important matter of human mankind? Forget it! Ideologies of putting every human matter in the midst of all interests - and setting at the same time our platform of living, the nature of our planet Earth, in the asshole, can no longer be tolerated. No philosopher or writer of the last hundred years saw the terrifying consequences of a living in an express train thundering soon into the wall down the valley, which I name in my books "End of human vanities and feasibilities". But all write beautiful stories about the adventure of human life, not imbedded in higher grounds of human reasoning. Where is the value of such scrap for the survival of all future generations of our children to come?
- But worst are the consequences were experienced with the Nobel Prize for Peace. What peace? The worst war profiteers, state criminals and torturers got the prize. For a little agreement that interrupted the crimes between hegemonics and weak minority nations or group of ethnics for a while, several politicians or generals got the prize and afterwards, these nations continued their crimes and everybody could see that the Nobel Committee has been laid in. The USA in Vietnam with three million civilians killed, they assisted Pinochet, Contra, Anti-Lumumba, Stroessner or Videla and his bunch of mad-gone patriots - and many other state terrorists and criminals in torturing to death their own youth, their own intelligensia, everywhere on this planet, in South and Central America, Africa, Asia - and they did not stop with that practice to this very day.
Persons like
Kissinger, McNamara, McCarthy, Nixon, Kennedy, Bush and almost all Presidents
of the
Based on the foregoing reasoning, the Nobel Prize fulfilled never any promises. But it still leaves wrong tracks in over 90 percent of brains of human mankind. We should have Prizes for: Ethics, feasibility without growth, preventing deadly human behaviourism against our platform of living, the Earth, for the protection of nature, animals, climate, to the benefit of all future generations to come - by keeping air, water, grounds clean and leaving a few resources and energy stuffs to those who should have had a chance to live on after us, for ten thousands of years to come, in harmony with the fundamental laws of the planet. Exactly those topics should have been the reason for writing literature, developing philosophy and natural sciences, which would not create odd stories or helpless theories - which will prove by the end to have shortened history of our species. To conclude: our present criminal politics and economics will end up in terrible and harmful effects for our daily life, all systems may collapse, and at the same time we continue to believe in a cynical "Peace in the world". Ethical and normal thinking prize-winners could we have expected instead of cynics and feasibility-believers, would the species Homo sapiens not have gone crazy long time ago.
The "Best of all worlds"? Yes, an Orwell-Earth, a "beautiful and new" technological surveillance-world, where the fear from terrorists is greater than the one from hegemonic and crazy-gone governments, with their gigantesk potential of self-destruction. Survival and future of human mankind demands for a vital change in our systems, our logics and our style of living. Therefore, future prices of dynamite would weigh low any ideas increasing the limits of growth, luxury and feasibility - otherwise human mankind will soon have made its last prayer.
Rene Delavy
Author of
"PLADESNIEKANT", "CHAOS" and "Power x Stupidity = Self
destruction"
www.rene-delavy.com
// www.pladesniekant.com